找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 1657|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【转帖】一个local中介对State Migration Plans and State Sponsorship的看法

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 30-6-2010 20:11:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
State Migration Plans and State Sponsorship

My present understanding based on conversations I have had is that:

* Those with "old style" subclass 176 visa sponsorship will not automatically transition to the higher priority SMP sponsorship.

* As such those who wish to be pushed up the processing pecking order will be required to seek sponsorship again, once the SMPs are published.

* It remains to be seen whether DIAC will allow sponsorship under a SMP to replace "old style" sponsorship on subclass 176 visa applications that are already lodged.

* It appears that subclass 176 visa applications supported by "old style" sponsorship will not be possible once the SMPs are in issue. Hence the SA Government's communication of earlier today requiring all visa applications with old style sponsorship to be submitted before 07/07/2010 (I will write an article for Go Matilda News discussing this later today).

This appears to stem from the Department of Immigration's use of quotas within the SMP sponsorship regime to control the number of applications under this higher priority category.

I hasten to add that in the absence of published material from DIAC I can only interpret what I am hearing, but I hope the above gives some direction in the fog of confusion that currently exists.

Best regards.
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 30-6-2010 20:20:12 | 只看该作者
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 30-6-2010 20:50:35 | 只看该作者
啥意思?拿到old type的州担保需要在7.7前提交申请吗?
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+10, 4-9-2026 09:09 , Processed in 0.010658 second(s), 19 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表