马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册
x
今天不小心看到这篇文章,后面几段有点乱,还看不太懂。
http://www.interfluidity.com/v2/5066.html
但是第三段有点意思。我就冒昧贴出来了。
Early in his talk, Summers pointed out, accurately, that economists really need to rethink the standard “labor / leisure tradeoff”. Almost no one prefers a life of pure “leisure”. Human beings like to regard themselves and to be regarded by others as “productive”. They like to “make a contribution” or “pay their own way” or “kick ass” or “dominate others”, to do something that they believe confers value and status. As Summers pointed out, retirement is often not so good for people. The luckiest people, young or old, are those whose work is fulfilling and enjoyable, not those who do not work at all. As people grow wealthy, they become more free to choose the ways by which, and the terms under which, they will do useful or important things. Wealth is better understood as conferring upon individuals a greater freedom of choice over what kinds of work they wish to do than as endowing lives of “leisure”. A person with wealth can explore roundabout and risky production processes (become an artist, write a novel, start a business), can opt for work with no hope of remuneration (volunteer, help raise a child or grandchild), or can hold out for only the most fulfilling or best-paid market labor. A person without wealth may be forced to accept degrading and poorly paid work, just to pay the bills.
大概是说赚钱不是为了退休,而是为了挣得一个选择的机会,能让自己自由的选择想干什么。当然这些选择当中也包括提前退休,啥都不干。
另外这篇文章里面有不少生词哦。@yearshappy @MICHELLE07
列几个我之前没看过的(我的词汇量是比较少的,不要见怪)
cogent
capstone
destitution
cudgel
presto
secular |