标题: 比较一下ford falcon和hollden commodore烧气的车 [打印本页] 作者: ila 时间: 5-3-2007 16:06 标题: 比较一下ford falcon和hollden commodore烧气的车 最近需要换个车，想买个大点的，使用gas的，所以选择只有ford和holden。
但听说hollden车不是很好，质量比较差。所以在此开帖向了解的筒子咨询一下。作者: cello 时间: 5-3-2007 16:09
holden is good but not good at LPG..look at the taxi and you will know
ford produces factory dedicated LPG, should be a good choice for you作者: ila 时间: 5-3-2007 16:21
regarding the maintaining fee, which one is better?作者: tuwh 时间: 5-3-2007 16:27
Both of Holden and Ford are cheap in maintainance coz they are the most popular brands in OZ and falcon and commondore are made in Australia.作者: ila 时间: 5-3-2007 16:40
but i heard the quality of holden is not very good. it is easy to occur prolblem if it is a used car.作者: tuwh 时间: 5-3-2007 19:58
原帖由 ila 于 5/3/2007 16:40 发表
but i heard the quality of holden is not very good. it is easy to occur prolblem if it is a used car.
Come on mate! If the quality of Holden is not good, why it's the most popular brand in Australia? There's lots of models under the brand Holden, Commodore, Astra, Berlina and HSV are all good cars. Howerver, Viva and Captiva are Korean craps.作者: cello 时间: 5-3-2007 20:29
i remember GM ranks no. 2 on overall quality after toyota according to a survey in us, and some european luxury brands such as mecedez or audi ranks after 10. and holden is part of GM, also export large cars to us under GM's brand.
but this kind of quality according to survey doesn't mean anything, japanese cars generally ranks better because they have much less problems in first 3 years, and the survey only counts the new car buyer. after a while, japanese cars won't design to last that long, and other things such as crash safety is not in the concern of quality as well..so it doesn't mean 'good quality' new cars would be good quality 2nd handed cars. and us/australia cars are less defined, lot more small problems comparing to others especially while new, doesn't necessarily mean the overall quality is that lower than others in fact.