FreeOZ论坛

标题: 请问我写的这memo有错误的语法吗?英语不好,请各位大大多多指教... [打印本页]

作者: cuppycake    时间: 28-3-2016 17:16
标题: 请问我写的这memo有错误的语法吗?英语不好,请各位大大多多指教...
memo的开头部分:

We are going to hold a meeting regarding the “Law of Tort” and “Negligent Misstatement”.

The Law of Tort is a civil wrong which is focused on individual misconduct that leads to individual loss or injury. In contrast, negligent misstatement must be proven on the balance of probabilities.

A relevant case of Negligent Misstatement is Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation (1987) in which initially the auditors were found to be negligent, yet they are not negligent due to a recession which broke the chain of causation.

以下这段要附上一个跟negligent misstatement 有关系的新闻:
Refer to one legal action in an Australian Court that has been reported in the newspaper. Attached herewith a printed copy for your perusal.

Lastly, in accordance with compliance requirements, staff could check the website given below regularly for the sake of keep yourself updated with changes to the laws regulating negligent misstatement and small business.

Please follow the link below:
http://www.treasury.gov.au/Polic ... bility/Misstatement

Should you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at ext 121.


Kind regards

xxxxx
作者: johnson    时间: 22-4-2016 23:14
微/q,2542395223学力认证丨毕业材料丨成绩材料咨询办里-诚招当地大学生代理
作者: 浮云云艾米莉    时间: 23-4-2016 19:09
倒不是说语法的问题,概念有点乱啊

This is a meeting regarding torts and Negligent Misstatement.

A tort is a civil wrong in common law jurisdiction which causes someone else's loss or injuries.

[In contrast, negligent misstatement must be proven on the balance of probabilities. ] - 这里不对啊,torts 也是要prove on the balance of probabilities. 而且negligent misstatement 的定义也没有出来。

A relevant case of Negligent Misstatement is Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation (1987) in which initially the auditors were found to be negligent, yet they are not negligent due to a recession which broke the chain of causation.  - 这里也不对。initially found to be negligent, 是lower court finding 么?然后higher court 推翻了?如果是不同的court要说清楚。可以说 in which the auditors were found to be negligent in the court of xxx. But the High Court overturned the previous decision and found the auditors to be not negligent on the basis that the chain of causation was broken by the recession.

以下这段要附上一个跟negligent misstatement 有关系的新闻:
Refer to one legal action in an Australian Court that has been reported in the newspaper. Attached herewith a printed copy for your perusal.  - 这个直接说refer to an Australian case on this issue. Attached is a printed copy for your review.

Lastly, in accordance with the compliance requirements, staff should regularly check the website below to keep updated with the legislation regulating negligent misstatement and small business.

Please follow the link below:
http://www.treasury.gov.au/Polic ... bility/Misstatement

Should you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at ext 121.


Kind regards

xxxxx




欢迎光临 FreeOZ论坛 (https://hioz.im/forum/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2